Second, you are comparing premades of good players against an antagonist.
Now read post again, beacause it seems like you just read the title and then go respond asap. Especially the part that says:
But to show how bad things are in this game - let's assume that we are fighting 4y.o. children, who will always lose in 1v1 fight just because they are bad.
And everything after that.
I read your post, and I already said that I don't believe that people who can't beat you because they are bad will beat you in the mission.
And I know that I am not the only one because I saw a video on youtube of 3 players together playing on skype testing this game. They were beated hard by the antagonist in each game, after 30-40 min the streamer girl changed to another game and said she hated the experience because it was so frustrating. Only one of them wanted to test the game a little more and got how the game worked. IMO this game needs a way to make the entry for new palyers much easier if they want that the casual players will play for more than 1 day.
I saw another video of an antagonist, someone that ended first in ranking admitting that it was way easier to win as antagonist that as a raiders. some of his gameplays where incredible fast, and probably a bad experience for the raiders.
Yeah I'm worried about the New Player experience vs. Antagonist.
Personally I was just fine with it as I've been "Welcomed" to Dark Souls many times by an invader. Honestly though it's similar as far as whether or not you get invaded. Just like Souls, if you don't want an Antagonist, play Solo. If you want to co-op, be ready for an Invader.
I think there's definitely an audience for this game, but not enough people have heard of it yet or had a chance to try it.