I'm confused... This game clearly and seemingly proudly states all over that it's a 4v1 game. Yet people are constantly complaining about it. I agree it is rather disappointing at times to lose to an Antag but that is precisely what makes winning all the more rewarding. I enjoy playing as a Raider more but I don't mind having an Antag or being an Antag. It just means you have to play smarter. This game is clearly not for the weak hearted. And it has been my current favorite for over 4 months now and I ain't stoppin til they shut her down. Or change the game entirely do to excessive whining. Like SW:Battlefront 1. Stay strong and practice more. Upgrade weapons and get good cards and everything can be a cake walk!

The problem is the game isn't solely a 4v1. You can have plenty of matches as a PvE and I'm sure they also advertise that.  I wouldn't know because it's been a while since I looked at advertisement.
I accepted antagonist as a sole part of this game and gotten use to dealing with it for both sides but still think the inclusion is a waste and act as a obstical with no extra benefit. Not everyone cares about pride and over coming "challenges." Some peeps just want a team base-third person - action shooter with there friends.
Plus it doesn't help that it's bad enough that people have to deal with a shitty grind system  that is only worsen when An antagonist job is to make that grind worse.

Yep, 110% agree with!!

Quote from: LordDraco3 on June 02, 2018, 03:08:27 AM

The dev post that made me make an account here argued that skins take a lot of work to make

That sounds like a cheap excuse to be able to have something expensive to sell, and of course they targeted the skins for this purpose because they knew there's always that group of people that throws their common sense out the window and buy them.
The real problem is that if people allows and support this behavior of course they're going to take advantage of that

That's why I considered a boycott.

So an alternative title for this was going to be "boycott skins?". If the game was more popular they would've been crucified on the spot. It wasn't until they tried charging  $60 that the community had enough and called therm out on it which makes me question how much others in the community are willing to spend since not  a lot of backlash was given for $20. 

 So I've been eagerly waiting for Iune's skin from her bio. More excited for this skin than a new weapon or character to be honest, but everytime I think about it I also think about the price and constantly question how much I'm willing to pay and if it's even ethical for them to charge a high price.

So honestly, I did buy Shae's when it was the highest priced skin to purchase. Even though I knew a skin for $20 was just stupid I prioritized my love for the art and design of this game. The character designs are main reason I love this game as much as I do in  the first place and supporting it didn't seem like a bad idea,  but ethically I knew it was a dumb move.

Till this day I'm dating how much would I spend now. I Question if I should let my love for whatever design push me or think more business like.  I noticed most fighting games charge $10 for a CHARACTER. Would you pay $10 for a skin when something much more practical cost less?

Would you, Or is it more about your personal taste, amount be damned (to a point)? This could also hurt people that think higher of their money and that's what I'm debating.

it was a lycus player, and on PS4. Aren't you on Xbox? Either way I do agree with you on antags being a waste of effort when even if you beat the mission you still come out way to freaking low.
the current patch was good but I'd lose my mind if they make significant boost in antag reward score for Raiders.

I agree with op

Fair enough. Honestly though, before they revealed the weapon I assumed they were "hyping up" for Schneider or Rak, but that was just a personal want. 
Cool idea to show off new weapons like this, though.